The Writer of the Federalist Papers Was a Realist

The Writer of the Federalist Papers Was a RealistThe writer of the Federalist Papers was James Madison. A true realist, he feared the trends of American politics at the time. He did not believe in 'foreign fashions' that were sweeping the country.In his personal life, he had been described as a man who believed, 'A king is to be the servant of the people.' And in a most unique way, this turned out to be exactly true.Although he certainly wasn't a man that knew what he was doing, the writer of the Federalist Papers understood that he would be, in a sense, in charge of the 'real power' of our government. So when he wrote the Federalist Papers, he also understood exactly what he was doing. For some, the famous phrase is a reference to the writing itself, where he stated, 'The power which the states possess over their own emoluments and properties, may justly be considered as the security of their liberty.'However, James Madison understood that he was, in essence, working for a coalition of people in Congress that we're all working towards one thing - to get more control of the American people. This is something that the writer of the Federalist Papers was well aware of. He was one of the leaders of this coalition.So as he wrote the Federalist Papers, he really believed that he was, in a sense, the man behind a coalition that would protect the American people. At the same time, he understood that he couldn't allow a coalition to emerge in Congress that would lose the freedom of the American people. This was because the writing of the Federalist Papers is also, of course, the 'man behind the curtain' of our modern political era.The writer of the FederalistPapers wanted the American people to know that there were other, less-desirable options that they had available to them. He never claimed that these were the best options, but he did want the people to understand that if they wanted to see a healthy democracy, then they needed to find other alternatives.His most fa mous quote was, 'It is with freedom that we stand or fall.' And he clearly understood that he was, in essence, an advocate for those in the originalist states, to get more control of the state governments.However, he also understood that he was a man that believed in 'transparency.' As he wrote in his writings, 'that there must be no secrecy on this occasion.' His last written work, the Federalist Papers, shows that he fully understood that he was speaking for himself, and that the American people would only accept the vision of the people if he spoke clearly, in the most honest and clear language that they could understand.

Title of the Paper Essays (656 words) - Education, Education Reform

Title of the Paper ( Education: Social Issue in the United States ) Presented By ( Kadeejah Johnson, [emailprotected] ) Number and Name of Course (Oral Communication - COMM 101) Class Meeting Time/Day (M/W/F: 9:00 A.M. - 9:50 A . M. ) Educator (Dr. Ephraim Okoro) Semester (Fall 2016) The present Date (Friday November 11 , 2016) Bowie State University Branch of Communications Bowie, Maryland A subject exceptionally consistent with my heart, has been the most discussed issue in the rural and downtowns of the United States and that is training. The misinterpretation with training is that it is free for everybody and is similarly appropriated to each understudy. The issue that has become the outside of instructor's dissatisfaction is Common Core, which is the standard test in both arithmetic and English. It has been realized that educators could just instruct understudies what the State or District permits them to educate with such controls of being inventive with the manner in which they approach the exercise. The subordinate social issue with instruction is that it is training doesn't have a place with the educators and the school's any longer, it has a place with the State and District; leaving instructors restricting what the understudies need to learn and the manner in which they should learn it. The most ideal approach to deal with the issue is to give training back t o the school and its organization to give the understudies the best possible instruction. Going into our twenty-first century, we are discovering an ever increasing number of understudies moving on from secondary school not set up to accomplish school level work or accomplish adequately in passage level employments. The open business network is starting to question whether government funded schools are fit for delivering people who can become profitable citizenry. They ask the educational systems how it is such huge numbers of understudies can graduate with not many abilities. One clarification is social advancement- - that is, educational systems' act of elevating an understudy to the following evaluation level paying little mind to their scholarly capacity. Albeit social advancement may appear to be unfamiliar to us today, it has a long history. Social advancement has been a component of instructive foundations for quite a long time. Advancement of an individual regardless of what his scholastic achievement has for quite some time been a standard technique. Schools can' t show up they are neglecting to teach their understudies so they take the necessary steps to elevate the understudy to the following evaluation. Will the discussions over training change ever end? Could any arrangement of training ever be shaped to fulfill the clashing wants of the individuals? The training of America's childhood is a significant dependent upon most voters. Training holds a couple of spots in each political decision and has consistently been a significant piece of each up-and-comer's foundation. The individuals of America have numerous sides to every one of the various issues that encompass instruction. A portion of these issues incorporate the substance of the educational plan, discipline strategies, security of the youngsters, packed study halls, zoning guidelines, nature of educators, and the consideration or avoidance of strict lessons. Guardians are lost in the ocean of various change thoughts to decide in favor of when they round out their voting forms. Just, guardians need their kids to get a wonderful instruction. Scanning for a school that can give such a training can end up being a troublesome erran d. The biggest provider of training is the legislature. While practically 50% of America believe the government funded schools to be not out of the question or more awful, the mind greater part of guardians keep on sending their youngsters to publics schools (Metropolitan). The most ideal approach to deal with such circumstances is to decide in favor of an applicant that bolsters the issues in the instructive framework, and to not subvert what the other competitor feels about training. Continuously think about how as a National circumstance can influence the eventual fate of your kids or conceivably even yourself.